Modeling: The Historical Evolution of Beauty Standards

The modeling industry has long been an influential force in shaping beauty standards, with both progressive and regressive impacts on societal perceptions of aesthetics, self-worth, and identity. Contemporary standards in the modeling business today are undergoing complex transformations—pushed and pulled by the forces of diversity, inclusivity, and tradition.

While social and technological advancements have opened the field to more diverse representations, many of the industry’s challenges and contradictions persist, sparking debates about the true inclusivity and realistic portrayals of beauty. This essay explores contemporary beauty standards in the modeling industry, examining both progressive trends and lingering issues that continue to influence societal views on beauty.

Photo by Pexels

The Historical Evolution of Beauty Standards in Modeling

Historically, beauty standards in the modeling industry have been narrow, often centered on Western ideals that emphasize thinness, youth, and symmetry. For decades, models were predominantly required to meet these rigid physical criteria, reflecting Eurocentric norms and excluding a range of body types, ethnicities, and features. During the late 20th century, the era of “supermodels” such as Naomi Campbell, Claudia Schiffer, and Cindy Crawford established a particular archetype of glamour and allure, setting a high bar for aspirants. The focus on an idealized image was heavily promoted through print media, runway shows, and high-fashion campaigns, which presented a limited, often unattainable version of beauty.

In the past two decades, however, a noticeable shift has occurred, partially fueled by societal movements and advancements in digital media. Social platforms have amplified voices demanding diversity and inclusivity, challenging traditional beauty norms and encouraging representation of a broader spectrum of appearances. While these shifts reflect progress, it is crucial to examine how deeply these changes have impacted the core of the modeling industry.

The Influence of Diversity and Inclusivity Movements

The influence of the body positivity movement has been especially prominent in challenging the modeling industry’s beauty standards. Models of various body types, ethnic backgrounds, and abilities have become increasingly visible, thanks to both demand from the public and progressive initiatives by brands and agencies. The rise of plus-size models, transgender models, and models with disabilities on global stages signals a move toward a more inclusive industry. Major fashion campaigns, such as those by brands like Fenty Beauty and Savage X Fenty, have made strides in redefining beauty by featuring models of all shapes, sizes, and backgrounds, garnering significant attention for their inclusivity.

Similarly, racial diversity has become a focal point, particularly as calls for equitable representation have intensified across media and culture. Brands and modeling agencies are more frequently casting models who break from Eurocentric standards of beauty, embracing darker skin tones, a variety of facial features, and non-Western aesthetics. This shift has implications beyond the fashion industry, affecting broader cultural perceptions by validating the beauty of groups that were historically marginalized or underrepresented.

Yet, despite these advances, tokenism remains a concern. While some agencies and brands genuinely embrace diversity, others adopt these practices more superficially, using diverse models for marketing purposes without addressing systemic biases within the industry. Token diversity, where only a minimal level of difference is represented to appear inclusive, often perpetuates stereotypes rather than genuinely advancing inclusive beauty standards.

The Role of Social Media and Digital Influence

Social media has redefined beauty standards in modeling by offering an alternative to traditional gatekeepers. Platforms such as Instagram and TikTok have empowered aspiring models to create their own brands, connect directly with followers, and develop a following without relying on traditional agencies. Many influencers and digital creators challenge conventional beauty norms by promoting authenticity, body positivity, and self-acceptance.

Social media’s influence has had dual effects. On the one hand, it has democratized access to the industry, allowing individuals who may not fit traditional beauty standards to find success and recognition. On the other hand, the rise of beauty filters and digital enhancements creates unrealistic expectations, as digitally altered appearances often set unattainable standards for physical perfection. The phenomenon of “Instagram beauty,” marked by airbrushed images and curated aesthetics, can contribute to increased body dissatisfaction, particularly among younger users, who may compare themselves to filtered representations of beauty.

Additionally, while social media has given rise to a more diverse modeling landscape, the relentless pursuit of popularity can sometimes reinforce existing standards. Models and influencers who attain the most followers often exhibit features that align with traditional notions of attractiveness, underscoring that the industry’s evolution is not entirely divorced from its past.

Persisting Challenges: Thinness, Youth, and Unrealistic Ideals

Despite advancements in diversity, thinness and youth remain prevailing standards in the modeling industry, especially in high fashion and runway shows. The majority of models on high-fashion runways still adhere to extremely thin body ideals, and the demand for youthfulness remains high. This trend is perpetuated by a marketing strategy that equates thinness and youth with luxury, elegance, and exclusivity, even as it faces criticism for promoting unrealistic body expectations.

The physical toll of maintaining these standards can be severe, with some models pressured to engage in extreme dieting and unhealthy practices to remain competitive. The psychological impact is significant as well, with models reporting heightened levels of anxiety, low self-esteem, and eating disorders. Despite increasing awareness and attempts by some brands to present more realistic images, the high-fashion industry still upholds an ideal that many consider both physically and mentally detrimental.

Gender and the Androgynous Aesthetic

The concept of gender in beauty standards has also undergone significant changes in recent years. The androgynous aesthetic, where the boundaries of traditional masculine and feminine traits are blurred, has become increasingly prevalent in fashion. This style, which challenges binary conceptions of gender, reflects a broader cultural movement toward gender fluidity and acceptance of non-binary identities. Models who embody both masculine and feminine traits are celebrated for their uniqueness and versatility, presenting a fresh perspective on beauty that defies convention.

Yet, as with other aspects of diversity, androgyny in modeling is often celebrated in specific, commercially advantageous ways. Certain high-fashion brands are more likely to embrace androgyny as it aligns with an edgy or avant-garde image, but mainstream acceptance of non-binary and gender-diverse models is still limited.

The Future of Beauty Standards in Modeling

Looking forward, the modeling industry faces a pivotal question: will it fully embrace a genuinely inclusive and representative vision of beauty, or will traditional standards continue to exert influence? The rise of virtual models and artificial intelligence-driven beauty ideals poses additional challenges, as digitally created models are often perfected versions of traditional standards, threatening to re-establish old norms through new mediums.

Progress within the modeling industry remains a journey rather than a destination. True inclusivity requires a more profound commitment than casting diverse models for occasional campaigns; it involves restructuring the industry’s underlying values and challenging long-standing biases. Additionally, models and consumers alike are increasingly demanding transparency and authenticity from brands, advocating for a beauty industry that prioritizes health, individuality, and the celebration of real, diverse beauty.

Conclusion

The modeling industry’s contemporary standards of beauty reflect a mix of progressive changes and enduring challenges. While movements toward diversity and inclusivity have broadened representations, deeply rooted biases around thinness, youth, and digital perfection still wield significant influence. Social media, gender fluidity, and technological innovations continue to shape the field, but genuine inclusivity demands ongoing efforts to dismantle outdated norms.

Only through a concerted commitment to authenticity, representation, and health can the modeling industry redefine beauty in ways that empower individuals and celebrate the multifaceted nature of human appearance.