Tree: The VR Ultimate Experience

Tree, an innovative virtual reality (VR) experience created by Milica Zec and Winslow Porter, is a transformative artistic venture that allows participants to viscerally embody a rainforest tree. Through immersive VR technology, the creators not only convey the beauty and grandeur of natural ecosystems but also starkly remind participants of their vulnerability to human impact. By embodying an immersive perspective on environmental change, Tree has catalyzed a new conversation about humanity’s complex relationship with nature, appealing to both intellect and emotion through its multifaceted narrative, immersive technique, and symbolic representation.

Picture by Pexels

Context and Artistic Intent

Tree emerged as a part of Zec and Porter’s multi-part VR series focused on environmental awareness, following their 2016 work Giant, which explored trauma and empathy through the perspective of wartime survivors. In Tree, however, they adopted an ecological focus, aiming to foster empathy for the environment by immersing viewers in the life of a tree—from seedling to full maturity, and ultimately, to its destruction by deforestation.

The creators designed Tree as a response to rising deforestation and global warming concerns. By inviting participants to experience nature through a tree’s life cycle, they aimed to shift perspectives, encouraging viewers to reconsider their actions and the broader impact of humanity on nature. In doing so, Zec and Porter address pressing issues in environmental science, ethics, and responsibility, crafting a new form of art that goes beyond passive viewing to generate lasting impressions and, ideally, behavioral change.

Experience and Technical Design

In Tree, participants wear VR equipment that immerses them in the growth and life cycle of a tree in a rainforest. The experience leverages VR’s 360-degree field of view and haptic feedback, which mimics sensations such as the stretching of branches, exposure to sunlight, and rainfall. The user begins as a seed, then experiences growth into a towering tree, perceiving the sounds, sights, and tactile qualities of a rainforest environment. This sensory immersion encourages a deep connection with the ecosystem, which participants inhabit not just visually but physically and spatially.

The VR environment changes dynamically, progressing through the life cycle of the tree, from sprouting to eventual destruction. Zec and Porter used VR to let viewers experience both the life-affirming growth and tragic destruction of trees firsthand. The experience concludes with a distressing scene in which the tree is cut down, underscoring the fragility of nature when confronted by human exploitation. This ending confronts viewers with an emotional reckoning, compelling them to consider their place in a world where trees—and ecosystems as a whole—are under constant threat from human activities.

Symbolism and Impact

Tree uses the tree as a metaphor for interconnectedness, resilience, and vulnerability. By experiencing life as a tree, viewers are encouraged to confront the implications of deforestation, climate change, and resource depletion on an emotional level. The choice of a rainforest tree is significant, as rainforests are known as the “lungs of the Earth,” contributing to oxygen production, biodiversity, and climate regulation. The destruction of the tree thus symbolizes the broader threat to ecological balance and to humanity’s future on a planet ravaged by environmental degradation.

The experience’s emotional impact stems from this strategic use of symbolism, as well as from the immediate empathy fostered by VR immersion. Studies in media psychology suggest that VR has a unique capacity to foster empathy because of the viewer’s psychological proximity to the subject matter. In Tree, this phenomenon is particularly poignant: by becoming the tree, participants might feel a heightened sense of vulnerability and sadness when facing their virtual destruction. This technique fosters what environmental philosopher Arne Naess would call “deep ecology”—an ethical framework that emphasizes an intrinsic connection between human and non-human life, encouraging a responsibility that transcends mere stewardship to embody a profound commitment to coexistence.

Broader Implications and Reception

Upon its release, Tree garnered significant acclaim in film festivals, including Sundance and Tribeca, as it bridged the gap between art, technology, and environmental activism. It aligns with a broader trend of VR being used as a tool for social impact, whereby the power of presence—the feeling of “being there”—can increase viewer empathy and awareness regarding social and environmental issues. This power of presence differentiates VR from traditional media: while films and documentaries can inform, VR experiences like Tree have the potential to evoke empathy and internalize the reality of environmental issues, which can lead to more lasting behavioral change.

In the context of climate activism, Tree serves as an innovative educational tool. Schools, museums, and environmental organizations have used it to engage audiences, particularly younger generations, in meaningful conversations about climate change. This novel medium highlights how VR can serve as an empathy machine, allowing viewers to feel the visceral impact of environmental degradation in a way that textual information or even visual documentaries cannot achieve. By experiencing nature’s destruction, audiences may feel a greater personal impetus to adopt sustainable behaviors and support conservation efforts.

Critique and Future Potential

While Tree has been celebrated for its emotional potency, it also raises questions about the limits of virtual empathy and the effectiveness of VR in driving tangible change. Some critics argue that while VR can raise awareness, it may fall short of inspiring the sustained actions needed to counter environmental degradation. To bridge this gap, environmental activists and educators are encouraged to integrate experiences like Tree with actionable follow-up steps, such as conservation pledges or community discussions, to transform emotional impact into long-term commitment.

Despite these critiques, Tree has set a high bar for using VR as a medium for ecological storytelling. It exemplifies the potential of VR not only as an entertainment platform but as a powerful tool for change. As technology advances, similar projects may offer even more detailed simulations, potentially integrating biofeedback or AI-driven narratives that respond to viewers’ emotional cues, further personalizing the experience and enhancing its impact.

Conclusion

In Tree, Milica Zec and Winslow Porter have pioneered a new approach to environmental art, utilizing VR to cultivate a deep-rooted empathy for nature. By enabling participants to experience life from a tree’s perspective, they evoke a profound sense of vulnerability, interconnectedness, and urgency around environmental issues. Tree is a call to consciousness, urging humanity to reconsider its relationship with nature, not from a place of superiority but from a shared existence and responsibility.

As VR technology continues to evolve, experiences like Tree may become central to environmental education and advocacy, helping to cultivate an empathetic, ecologically aware society that feels, rather than merely understands, the value of preserving our natural world.